1. Caching
Caching is the ability to store copies of frequently accessed data in several places along the request-response path.
When a consumer requests a resource representation, the request goes through a cache or a series of caches (local cache, proxy cache, or reverse proxy) toward the service hosting the resource.
If any of the caches along the request path has a fresh copy of the requested representation, it uses that copy to satisfy the request. If none of the caches can satisfy the request, the request travels to the service (or origin server as it is formally known).
By using HTTP headers, an origin server indicates whether a response can be cached and, if so, by whom, and for how long.
Caches along the response path can take a copy of a response, but only if the caching metadata allows them to do so.
Optimizing the network using caching improves the overall quality-of-service in the following ways:
- Reduce bandwidth
- Reduce latency
- Reduce load on servers
- Hide network failures
2. Caching in REST APIs
Being cacheable is one of the architectural constraints of REST.
- GET requests should be cachable by default – until a special condition arises. Usually, browsers treat all GET requests as cacheable.
- POST requests are not cacheable by default but can be made cacheable if either an
Expiresheader or aCache-Controlheader with a directive, to explicitly allows caching, is added to the response. - Responses to
PUTandDELETErequests are not cacheable at all.
Below given are main HTTP response headers that we can use to control caching behavior:
2.1. Expires
The Expires HTTP header specifies an absolute expiry time for a cached representation. Beyond that time, a cached representation is considered stale and must be re-validated with the origin server. To indicate that a representation never expires, a service can include a time up to one year in the future.
Expires: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:20:49 IST2.2. Cache-Control
The header value comprises one or more comma-separated directives. These directives determine whether a response is cacheable, and if so, by whom, and for how long e.g. max-age or s-maxage directives.
Cache-Control: max-age=3600Cacheable responses (whether to a GET or to a POST request) should also include a validator — either an ETag or a Last-Modified header.
2.3. ETag
An ETag value is an opaque string token that a server associates with a resource to uniquely identify the state of the resource over its lifetime. When the resource changes, the ETag changes accordingly.
ETag: "abcd1234567n34jv"2.4. Last-Modified
Whereas a response’s Date header indicates when the response was generated, the Last-Modified header indicates when the associated resource last changed. The Last-Modified value cannot be less than the Date value.
Last-Modified: Fri, 10 May 2016 09:17:49 IST
The chrome browser is not caching the “post” request’s response, even though i have the ‘Cache-Control’: ‘max-age=600’, in the response header.
Anything else i need to do on the same? Any help is appreciated.
Read SO Thread
If you are caching on a field level basis, and you want to update three fields of a record with a PUT request, the PUT response needs to contain the CURRENT modified date as well as the PREVIOUS modified date, using both the “Last-Modified:” and “If-Last-Modified:” headers.
Then this logic can be applied for updating the cache:
If the “If-Last-Modified:” date DOES NOT match the cache record’s last modified date, invalidate the record and keep only the three fields that were updated in the PUT request.
If the “If-Last-Modified:” date DOES match the cache record’s last modified date, simply update the three fields in the cache.
Of course, the cache’s record’s last modified date will also need to be updated using the value in the “Last-Modified:” header.
I’m confused on the “PUT vs POST” page I read this: “PUT is idempotent, so you can cache the response.”.
On this page under “Caching in REST APIs” I read this: “Responses to PUT and DELETE requests are not cacheable at all.”
Feels like one of the two needs to be altered.
Thanks for observing and sharing it. Yes. You are right that both are contradictory statements. I have updated the text on first article.
Looks like, you haven’t updated yet. So, PUT is idempotent, therefore its response is cache-able, right?
It’s updated now. Thank You !!
Thats not true. The purpose of PUT is to update the repository (any kind) on the server side. I am not sure if there is anything to cache at all.
I tend to agree, PUT for the purpose of updating something typically need not be cached by client.